Problem work
 
BACK
  แก้ปัญหา perl spam 166

Date : 2010-12-21 Time : 11:23:50
21/12/2553
perl    16460 apache  663u   REG       7,0        0        41 /tmp/ZCUDTmJQSA (deleted)



From Author aa ( a )

Comment : 1
[root@ns7 ~]# ls -al /usr/bin/perl
-rwx------ 2 root root 14836 Apr 3 2009 /usr/bin/perl
[root@ns7 ~]# chmod 755 /usr/bin/perl
[root@ns7 ~]# ls -al /usr/bin/perl
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 14836 Apr 3 2009 /usr/bin/perl
[root@ns7 ~]# chmod 700 /usr/bin/perl
 

From. a ( a ) Date : 2011-03-29 Time : 16:53:54
 
Comment : 2
[root@ns7 bin]# ls -al |grep perl
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 24106 Apr 3 2009 find2perl
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 14836 Apr 3 2009 perl
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 14836 Apr 3 2009 perl5.8.8
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 36840 Apr 3 2009 perlbug
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 17953 Apr 3 2009 perlcc
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 224 Apr 3 2009 perldoc
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 11937 Apr 3 2009 perlivp
[root@ns7 bin]# chmod 700 /usr/bin/perl
[root@ns7 bin]# ls -al |grep perl
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 24106 Apr 3 2009 find2perl
-rwx------ 2 root root 14836 Apr 3 2009 perl
-rwx------ 2 root root 14836 Apr 3 2009 perl5.8.8
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 36840 Apr 3 2009 perlbug
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 17953 Apr 3 2009 perlcc
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 224 Apr 3 2009 perldoc
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 11937 Apr 3 2009 perlivp
 

From. a ( a ) Date : 2010-12-22 Time : 12:29:52
 
Comment : 3
[root@ns7 tmp]# cat folk.pl
#!/usr/bin/perl

$pid = fork();
if( $pid == 0 ){
print "This is child process\n";
print "Chile process is existing\n";
exit 0;
}
print "This is parent process and child ID is $pid\n";
print "Parent process is existing\n";
exit 0;

#This will produce following result



#This is parent process and child ID is 16417
#Parent process is existing
#This is child process
#Chile process is existing
 

From. a ( a ) Date : 2010-12-22 Time : 11:17:49
 


Add Your Comment :
Name :
E-mail :
  ย่อหน้า ตัวหนา ตัวยก เส้นใต้ตัวห้อย ตัวหนังสือเรืองแสง ตัวหนังสือมีเงา ตัวเอียง สีแดง สีเขียว สีน้ำเงิน  
  30414  
 
Message :
Picture(Not More Than 50 k):
  Confirm that not spam
 

 

Back To Comment